Earlier today , Google took to Google+ to debunk what it lay claim to be the “ Top 10 Google Glass Myths . ” But while there are plenty of Glass half - the true swirling around the internet , Google ’s list does n’t check any of them . Instead , it ’s a sky - high pile of strawmen that reassert just one thing : Google ’s fully on the Glass defensive attitude .
It was n’t supposed to be like this . When Glasswas first precede , it was demonstrate as the utopian concourse of connectedness , augmented reality , and skydive . But as the years have passed , and we ’ve seen more and more of Glass in action , the faceputer criticisms have begin to outweigh the wish . Google ’s endeavor to win back spunk and idea , though , rings hollow .
From the start , Google ’s open missive manages to be congenial , forge , and condescending all at once :

Myths can be fun , but they can also be confusing or unsettling . And if verbalise enough , they can morph into something that resembles fact . ( Side note : did you do it that multitude used to think that traveling too chop-chop on a gearing would damage the human dead body ? )
In its comparatively scant existence , Glass has see some myths develop around it . While we ’re flatter by the attention , we recollect it might make sense to take on them , just to exonerate the air . And besides , everyone bang a good inclination .
Now that we ’ve all learn what myth are and how emotion work — thanks , Google!—let ’s take a look at some of the attention Google claims to be “ flatter ” by . It ’s not just thinkpieces about the Glassopticon that have appeared here and elsewhere . latterly Glass has been in the news because its wearers have beenphysically assault , its presence has been banned , and its other adopters have beenmocked mercilessly . These are all worth a serious conversation ! But a coy claim of “ flattery ” is n’t the best way to initiate one .

What ’s worse though is that the “ myth ” that Google fight back itself from are n’t actually concerns in the first property . For example :
Myth 4 – Glass is quick for prime sentence
Glass is a paradigm , and our Explorers and the broad public are playing a vital role in how it ’s rise . In the last 11 months , we ’ve had nine computer software update and three hardware updates based , in part , on feedback from citizenry like you . at last , we hope even more feedback gets broil into a polished consumer mathematical product ahead of being released . And , in the future , today ’s paradigm may look as funny to us as that mobile phone from the mid 80s .

Nowhere is anyone arrogate that Glass is in its final , perfect form ; that much is obvious from the fact that it ’s not even uncommitted for sale to the public yet . alternatively , Google ’s just using this as an opportunity to re - emphasize that , hey , guys , we ’re still make on it . We love problems ! More problems intend more feedback !
It ’s one of several straw man that populate the post , optimized and hyperblized so that Google can hash over the same pro - Glass arguments . By setting up ludicrous claim that absolutely no one is making , the company sets a stage in which anything it says will seem fair by default . Unfortunately for Google , anyone learn this letter also hap to own the power of sight .
Myth 6 : Glass covers your eye(s )

“ I ca n’t guess having a screen over one eye … ” one expert enjoin in a recent article . Before jumping to finale about Glass , have you in reality judge it ? The Glass concealment is designedly above the right eye , not in front or over it . It was designed this way because we understand the importance of making middle contact and look up and engaging with the world , rather than down at your phone .
See , do n’t conceive the hypothecate expert . They do n’t even know that Glass is n’t a full lens system ! There ’s just one problem with that . The “ expert ” claim Google summon is actually justa quote given by a AAA auto cabaret employeeto his local paper . Unless you ’re talking about changing tire , call this valet de chambre an expert is willfully misleading and , honestly , kind of disdainful .
If Google want the public to palpate good about Glass , oppose myths that do n’t be and assuming multitude are too dumb to know the difference is n’t going to help make its event . It only further alienate a universe that already seesGoogle as a troupe out of touchwith what literal , human interaction actually implicate .

http://valleywag.gawker.com/why-google-glass-is-so-bad-and-hated-and-will-never-wor-1543952100
It does n’t aid that the “ myth ” post number on the heels of Google ’s awkwardGlass etiquette guidebook . Among other confidential information on how to be a running member of society while Glassed , Googleadvisesthat you , “ ask for permission . stand alone in the corner of a room staring at people while recording them through Glass is not become to win you any friend ( see Don’ts # 4 ) . ” Furthermore , “ if you find yourself stare off into the optical prism for long period of clock time you ’re belike look pretty weird to the people around you . ” And most significantly , do n’t “ be creepy or bounderish . ” All of which is cracking advice — for a tot , or someone exiting their nuclear bunker for the very first fourth dimension .
People want their wearable technical school to be as minimally trespassing as potential — especially when it ’s someone else ’s . Glass is the precise opposite of that , and there ’s nothing Google can do to interchange that . They can tilt at windmills all they need — Myth 2 : Glass is always on and register everything — but multitude are n’t move to suddenly forget that the figurer adhere to their face is probable to cause more job than it lick .

Google still does n’t seem to get that the criticism it ’s facing is n’t personal . Any novel and potentially invasive technology would be subject to the same scrutiny . It just so happens that Google is a massive ship’s company touting its potentially invasive engineering as the beginning of the future — something like that is n’t plump to be easy to disregard .
There are conversation that need to bechance around Glass , but they ’re not over whether it ’s just for rich masses ( Myth 8) or just for wonk ( Myth 3 ) or is banned literally everywhere on Earth ( Myth 9 ) . And saying that we ’ll get used to Glass the way of life we did cellphone cameras ( Myth 10 ) is either a disingenuous feint or an actual misunderstanding what hoi polloi ’s logical Glass concerns are .
Either mode , Google clearly feels like it ’s on the rophy . But if Glass is ever going to make , they ’re going to need to jump punching at the things that actually count .

GoogleGoogle Glass
Daily Newsletter
Get the secure tech , skill , and culture tidings in your inbox daily .
intelligence from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like







![]()
