Your grandparent lived in a simpler time when nutrient was salubrious , homemade , and garish , right ? incorrect — at least that last part . Although food for thought prices have plain ascend in the past half a century , our spending on nutrient as a ratio of income has actually fall drastically since the sixties .
A new chart publish by the U.S. Department of Agriculture show how the modal share of per capitaincome pass on food fell from 17.5 percentage in 1960 to 9.6 percent in 2007 , rally a little to land at 9.9 percent in 2013 . Annette Clauson , an farming economist with the USDA ’s Economic Research Service who helped cipher the data in the chart , explains toNPR ’s The saltiness , " We are purchasing more intellectual nourishment for less money , and we are purchase our food for less of our income . This is a respectable thing , because we have income to buy other things . "
As the graph testify , this is mostly due to fall ( comparative ) grocery damage . The percent of income devote to feed out has actually uprise , slightly , over the years , while the per capita cost of food consumed in the home has plummeted .
Of course , things are not altogether equal across socioeconomic divides ; the less money you make , the great portion of it you ’ll be forced to pass on necessities like nutrient , even if wealthier families are still expend a higher total amount . For instance , in 2013 , the abject income bracket spent on medium $ 3655 per year on food , or 36 percent of full income . Meanwhile , people in the highest income bracket drop about $ 11,000 every year on food — more than double the full amount , but still only about 8 percentage of their net income .
you may stop out all the data , including how dissimilar rural area equate , here .
